Amid escalating tensions, Libya's warring factions have publicly rejected a claimed agreement to accept deported migrants from the U.S., with assertions that it would infringe on national sovereignty.
Libya Denies Deal to Accept Deported U.S. Migrants
Libya Denies Deal to Accept Deported U.S. Migrants
Both rival Libyan governments assert no agreement exists with the U.S. regarding deportees, citing sovereignty concerns.
The internationally recognized Libyan government based in Tripoli, alongside the eastern administration led by Khalifa Hifter, denied any arrangements with the U.S. for the transfer of deported individuals. U.S. officials had indicated that military flights carrying immigrants could commence imminently.
Both factions issued statements dismissing reports of any deals, maintaining that such actions cannot proceed without official consent. The Tripoli government emphasized its disapproval of treating Libya as a destination for deportees without its involvement, alluding to potential unauthorized agreements made by entities in the east. Meanwhile, Hifter’s administration similarly rejected the notion of any absconding deals regarding the movements of migrants.
This potential deportation plan has raised alarm due to Libya’s dire human rights record concerning migrants. Classified as a hub for people en route to Europe, Libya hosts numerous detention centers criticized for egregious conditions, including reports of torture and sexual violence against detainees.
The implications of these statements underscore the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the region, particularly given past interactions between the Trump administration and Hifter, who is associated with key oil resources in Libya.
With both governments firmly denying the arrangement, the future of the deportation plan remains uncertain amidst Libya’s ongoing political turmoil.
Both factions issued statements dismissing reports of any deals, maintaining that such actions cannot proceed without official consent. The Tripoli government emphasized its disapproval of treating Libya as a destination for deportees without its involvement, alluding to potential unauthorized agreements made by entities in the east. Meanwhile, Hifter’s administration similarly rejected the notion of any absconding deals regarding the movements of migrants.
This potential deportation plan has raised alarm due to Libya’s dire human rights record concerning migrants. Classified as a hub for people en route to Europe, Libya hosts numerous detention centers criticized for egregious conditions, including reports of torture and sexual violence against detainees.
The implications of these statements underscore the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in the region, particularly given past interactions between the Trump administration and Hifter, who is associated with key oil resources in Libya.
With both governments firmly denying the arrangement, the future of the deportation plan remains uncertain amidst Libya’s ongoing political turmoil.
