The recent shift in Mexico's judicial election process, where judges are now elected rather than appointed, has resulted in a significant consolidation of power for the ruling Morena party amidst a backdrop of low voter participation and concerns over corruption and judicial independence.
Mexico's Shift to Elected Judges Sparks Concerns Over Democratic Integrity

Mexico's Shift to Elected Judges Sparks Concerns Over Democratic Integrity
A new judicial election in Mexico reveals worrying low voter turnout and raises alarms about the future of democracy under the ruling Morena party.
In a landmark transition, Mexico has started electing its judges instead of appointing them, a development that many view as a pivotal moment for the nation’s democracy. However, the results of this shift have raised alarm bells regarding democratic integrity and power consolidation by the ruling Morena party, which is already at the helm of the presidency and Congress.
The June judicial elections saw a strikingly low voter turnout, with many citizens disillusioned about the electoral process, highlighting fears of democratic backsliding. Critics argue that by allowing judges to be elected, the possibility of impartial and independent judiciary is jeopardized as those aligned with Morena have emerged victorious in many pivotal positions.
The judicial overhaul, described by Morena leaders as essential for enhancing accountability and combating corruption, has instead led to the appointment of party loyalists in crucial judicial roles. The new structure includes a tribunal with the authority to dismiss judges, thereby raising concerns over potential politicization of the judiciary.
María Emilia Molina, a prominent circuit magistrate, voiced her apprehensions about the erosion of judicial independence, stating that the current administration has amassed control over significant branches of governance, including an unprecedented dominance of the judiciary.
In response to the overhaul, Molina and other judges have initiated legal challenges through an international human rights commission, asserting that the changes endanger not only legal integrity but also the rights of existing judges. As the political landscape further evolves, many are left questioning the future of democracy in Mexico and the safeguards necessary to protect judicial independence from political encroachment.