Lyle and Erik Menendez, convicted in 1996 for their parents' murders, have gained renewed attention after a resentencing hearing made them eligible for parole, though their recent applications were denied. The case remains polarizing and is being re-evaluated in light of a recent Netflix series.
Menendez Brothers: A Complex Case of Crime and Controversy

Menendez Brothers: A Complex Case of Crime and Controversy
The 1989 family tragedy involving Lyle and Erik Menendez has resurfaced due to legal developments and a new Netflix drama.
In 1989, Lyle and Erik Menendez, then aged 18 and 21, executed a gruesome act by murdering their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, within the confines of their Beverly Hills mansion. The brothers, convicted of first-degree murder and conspiracy in 1996, received life sentences without the possibility of parole—a sentence that has recently come under scrutiny following public interest reinvigorated by the Netflix drama, "Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story," released in 2024.
A resentencing hearing in May 2025 initially opened the door for parole eligibility, but when both Erik, now 54, and Lyle, 57, applied in August, California's parole board denied their requests. During the hearings, Erik was described as still posing a risk to society, while Lyle was noted for his ongoing struggles with anti-social behavior despite showing some remorse. They are eligible to reapply for parole in three years, potentially reduced to 18 months for good behavior.
The brothers’ path to resentencing emerged from a campaign initiated by former Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón, who argued that their sentences should reflect their ages at the time of the crime. Family and former inmates supported their request for leniency, though prosecutors countered that the Menendez brothers had not taken full responsibility for their actions.
Initially, the brothers claimed self-defense from years of alleged abuse by their parents, which remains a contentious point in their case—the prosecution posited that the motivation behind the murders was to secure the family’s considerable fortune. The trials surrounding their convictions were chaotic, with two mistrials leading to a joint trial where significant evidence regarding their claims of abuse was barred.
In the wake of their case receiving renewed focus due to the Netflix series, which has sparked discussions around their actions and motives, Erik Menendez responded critically to the dramatic portrayal, asserting that it misrepresents their story. The show, which captured significant viewer numbers shortly after its debut, has rekindled conversations around the nature of violence and retribution, and how media representation can shape public perception of real crimes.
This ongoing saga highlights not only the complexities of justice but also the ways in which narratives—both in court and media—continue to evolve and influence societal views on crime and punishment.