With the crucial Trump-Putin summit underway without any Ukrainian representation, citizens express deep anxieties about the future of their homeland and their voices being left unheard.
Voices Silenced: Ukrainians Anticipate Talks Without Their Participation

Voices Silenced: Ukrainians Anticipate Talks Without Their Participation
As negotiations between Trump and Putin begin, Ukrainians voice their fears and frustrations over potential territorial concessions without their involvement.
In the emotionally charged atmosphere of Ukraine, citizens find themselves anxiously watching as negotiations unfold between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin—a summit that, strikingly, excludes them from any meaningful participation. As discussions over potential land swaps loom, Ukrainians brace themselves for outcomes that could have devastating implications for their territories and their lives.
Tetyana Bessonova, a resident of the eastern city of Pokrovsk, articulated the pervasive worries: "My hometown is on the line of fire. If active fighting stops, would I be able to return?" For many like her, the disheartening prospect of losing their homeland becomes all too real in light of geopolitical maneuvers—decisions about borders are fraught with personal pain and uncertainty.
As polls reveal that an overwhelming majority of Ukrainians distrust Putin, the feelings of fatigue with ongoing conflict and skepticism surrounding the summit exacerbate the atmosphere of dread. The implications of agreements made in Alaska are particularly concerning, with fears that Trump, known for his erratic decision-making, could concede to Putin’s demands without adequately consulting or considering the Ukrainian perspective.
Concerns about Trump’s motives surface as Ukrainian MP Oleksandr Merezhko highlights the dangers of hidden agreements: "Knowing Trump, he can change his opinion very quickly. There is great danger in that for us." Many Ukrainians perceive the summit as a closed-door affair that could inadequately address their security needs.
Consequently, discussions arise around the contentious idea of territorial compromises, with various strategies speculated, from frozen frontlines to formal annexations by Russia. Though poll results suggest some acceptance of negotiated compromises, the necessity for international security guarantees remains paramount. Any signs of abandonment could exacerbate ongoing hostilities, leaving Ukrainians vulnerable to renewed aggression.
Voices from diverse backgrounds echo this anxiety. Luibov Nazarenko, a retired factory worker, reflects on the human cost of continued conflict: “I just don't want people to die.” Her plea resonates as Ukrainians grapple with hard choices about their future and potential sacrifices for peace.
In a poignant gathering at St. Michael's Monastery in Kyiv, Fr. Oleksandr Beskrovniy leads a prayer service, highlighting the profound injustice felt by Ukrainians as their fate hangs in limbo. With prayer as their solace, many hope that, despite the negotiations, their voices will ultimately be heard and that the need for human welfare will triumph over territorial disputes.
As the clock ticks down to the negotiations in Alaska, the anticipation is heavy with a sense of loss over the lack of Ukrainian participation. Citizens cling to the hope that their plight will resonate beyond the conference room and guide the diplomatic landscape into a more just resolution.