Following President Trump's executive order to dismantle the Agency for Global Media, which oversees Voice of America and Radio Free Asia, Chinese nationalists are rejoicing. These U.S.-funded outlets have long faced criticism from Beijing for their coverage of human rights abuses, and recent cuts raise concerns about their operational futures.
Trump’s Media Cuts Spark Celebration Among Chinese Nationalists

Trump’s Media Cuts Spark Celebration Among Chinese Nationalists
Chinese state media praises significant budget reductions impacting Voice of America and Radio Free Asia, fueling the Communist Party's narrative against U.S. influence.
Chinese state media outlets are expressing delight as significant budget cuts to Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) unfold, following an executive order from President Trump aimed at dismantling the Agency for Global Media, the federal body responsible for these outlets. For decades, VOA and RFA have provided essential news coverage to the Chinese populace, a region often restricted from accessing unbiased information.
The recent actions have led state media and nationalists in China to proclaim a victory, reinforcing their long-held grievances concerning American media influence. VOA and RFA's services, which include broadcasts in Mandarin, Cantonese, Uyghur, and Tibetan among other languages, have consistently faced measures of suppression by Beijing, with their transmissions frequently jammed.
In an editorial piece, the Global Times, aligned with the Communist Party, denigrated VOA as a "propaganda tool" and a "lie factory," attributing various narratives on negative aspects of China, such as Taiwan and the Hong Kong protests, to the network. They noted the cuts as validation of their assertions against the credibility of U.S. funded media.
Following Trump's order, a wave of uncertainty looms over VOA and RFA, with many staff members being put on paid leave and RFA seeing the termination of federal funding as of Saturday. Charging that this funding issue has potential ripple effects, advocates are concerned about the future of these critical independent reporting entities. As discussions around media integrity and freedom continue, the global response will likely shape the narrative surrounding access to unfiltered information within regions governed by strict censorship.