In a significant move that has ignited a global outcry, former President Donald Trump has issued an executive order to escalate deep-sea mining activities in U.S. waters and unregulated international zones, prompting immediate criticism from various nations and environmental groups alike.
Trump's Executive Order on Deep-Sea Mining Provokes Global Backlash
Trump's Executive Order on Deep-Sea Mining Provokes Global Backlash
Former President of the United States signs order to boost mineral exploration amid environmental concerns.
The Metals Company has formally applied to the US government for permits to mine the deep sea. Trump's executive order aims to increase the United States' access to critical minerals necessary for aerospace, healthcare, and green technology sectors by tapping into the rich resources contained in polymetallic nodules on the ocean floor.
The latest order is designed to "establish the United States as a global leader in responsible seabed mineral exploration," according to the official statement. However, the announcement has raised flags among numerous countries and organizations concerned about potential environmental damage and violations of international law.
China, a leading producer of critical minerals, denounced the U.S. decision, calling it an infringement on international agreements. According to a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Guo Jiakun, the U.S. approach endangers global collective interests related to deep-sea mining.
The Trump administration claims that regulatory changes could lead to a projected GDP increase of $300 billion over the next decade and potentially create 100,000 jobs. Yet this has not quelled fears of environmental repercussions. Many scientists and conservationists caution that the uncharted deep-sea ecosystems risk being irreparably harmed, asserting that the mining process will disrupt not just the ocean floor but the aquatic environment as a whole.
Jeff Watters from Ocean Conservancy expressed grave concerns about the far-reaching impacts of deep-sea mining, emphasizing that the ecological harm transcends immediate mining operations.
Despite the backlash, The Metals Company (TMC) has already begun seeking permits for operations in international territories and aims to commence mining activities before year-end. TMC CEO Gerard Barron has downplayed environmental risks, asserting that such regions possess minimal biological activity.
As the debate intensifies, the ultimate fate of deep-sea mining remains uncertain, with voices on all sides calling for comprehensive research and transparency before any projects proceed.
The latest order is designed to "establish the United States as a global leader in responsible seabed mineral exploration," according to the official statement. However, the announcement has raised flags among numerous countries and organizations concerned about potential environmental damage and violations of international law.
China, a leading producer of critical minerals, denounced the U.S. decision, calling it an infringement on international agreements. According to a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, Guo Jiakun, the U.S. approach endangers global collective interests related to deep-sea mining.
The Trump administration claims that regulatory changes could lead to a projected GDP increase of $300 billion over the next decade and potentially create 100,000 jobs. Yet this has not quelled fears of environmental repercussions. Many scientists and conservationists caution that the uncharted deep-sea ecosystems risk being irreparably harmed, asserting that the mining process will disrupt not just the ocean floor but the aquatic environment as a whole.
Jeff Watters from Ocean Conservancy expressed grave concerns about the far-reaching impacts of deep-sea mining, emphasizing that the ecological harm transcends immediate mining operations.
Despite the backlash, The Metals Company (TMC) has already begun seeking permits for operations in international territories and aims to commence mining activities before year-end. TMC CEO Gerard Barron has downplayed environmental risks, asserting that such regions possess minimal biological activity.
As the debate intensifies, the ultimate fate of deep-sea mining remains uncertain, with voices on all sides calling for comprehensive research and transparency before any projects proceed.
