The Trump administration has mandated federal employees to report on diversity initiatives within their agencies, raising alarm among workers concerned about retaliation and workplace morale. This directive follows the president's executive orders eliminating DEI programs, sparking debate over the implications for minority representation in government jobs.
Federal Employees Face Pressure to Report Diversity Initiatives Amid DEI Ban

Federal Employees Face Pressure to Report Diversity Initiatives Amid DEI Ban
Thousands of U.S. government workers are instructed to report diversity efforts or face potential repercussions, stirring tension within federal agencies.
The Trump administration has generated significant controversy with a recent directive requiring federal employees to report any diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within their agencies. In an email sent to thousands of workers, the administration urged staff to inform on colleagues involved in such programs or face “adverse consequences.” This tool of scrutiny follows President Donald Trump’s move to dismantle DEI programs across the government through executive orders.
Current employees at various agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), expressed feelings of anxiety and alarm regarding the implications of this directive. One employee revealed their discomfort with the expectation to implicate colleagues, stating, “We're really freaked out and overwhelmed.” The guidance from the Office of Personnel Management insisted that emails detailing any DEI activities should be submitted to a newly established government address within 10 days.
Responses to these emails varied across federal agencies, with staff at the Treasury Department receiving a version that did not include the mention of “adverse consequences” for noncompliance. Following the ban on DEI programs, Trump also placed employees working in these roles on immediate paid administrative leave.
The DEI programs aim to foster minority engagement in the workforce and raise awareness around discrimination. However, critics, including Trump and his supporters, view them as discriminatory practices that consider race, gender, and sexual identity instead of focusing purely on merit.
Advocates for the initiative, such as Yukong Mike Zhao, president of the Asian American Coalition for Education, claim that Trump’s actions represent progress in American civil rights by moving toward a merit-based system. Meanwhile, federal employees fear these developments, citing intimidation rather than an emphasis on fairness as the true motivation behind the emails.
The email’s far-reaching implications have led to confusion in various federal agencies, affecting hiring practices and halting essential research grants aimed at enhancing minority participation in scientific fields. Employees have reported increased apprehension regarding project developments and future opportunities, with some even mentioning a complete freeze on DEI-related activities at certain agencies.
Despite the challenges posed by the directive, employees continue to navigate their responsibilities while grappling with an uncertain future. The White House has yet to respond to requests for comment on this controversial initiative, leaving federal workers with lingering questions about the consequences of the ban on DEI programs.