In a contentious diplomatic move, Thailand welcomes Myanmar's military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, just days after a catastrophic earthquake hit his country, raising alarms over human rights implications.
Thailand Welcomes Controversial Myanmar General Amid Earthquake Crisis

Thailand Welcomes Controversial Myanmar General Amid Earthquake Crisis
As Myanmar grapples with the aftermath of a devastating earthquake, Thailand hosts the military leader facing global condemnation.
Myanmar's Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, poorly regarded on the international stage, made a rare visit to Thailand for a regional summit shortly after a tragic earthquake in Myanmar reported to have taken the lives of at least 3,085 people. The timing of his visit has sparked outrage, with critics condemning Thailand's choice to engage with a leader accused of multiple human rights violations and considered a pariah by many nations.
Hlaing's global isolation has deepened since he seized power in a coup in 2021, resulting in numerous sanctions and a barred entry to Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) meetings due to unmet peace agreements regarding Myanmar’s civil unrest. The International Criminal Court has also issued an arrest warrant for Hlaing, accusing him of crimes against humanity.
Despite this backdrop, Hlaing's presence in Bangkok marks his first trip to a Southeast Asian country since the coup, presenting the opportunity for Myanmar's military regime to gain some international legitimacy. For Thailand, which is already hosting a significant number of refugees fleeing violence in Myanmar, maintaining stable relations with Hlaing's government may be viewed as a necessity to manage the flow of those seeking safety.
However, critics, including former Thai foreign minister Kasit Piromya, argue that this visit reflects a broader disregard for human rights in Thailand's foreign policy. Kasit calls such engagement an “insult” to ASEAN, highlighting a perceived complicity in the actions and decisions of a military that disregards civilian welfare. This confrontation raises crucial questions about the role of regional politics and ethics in the context of effective diplomacy and humanitarian responsibility.