Unmasking Media Manipulation: The Khadeeja Safdar Controversy

In a thorough critique, Alki David accuses Wall Street Journal journalist Khadeeja Safdar of spreading misinformation and overlooking crucial elements in high-stakes abuse cases involving figures like Jeffrey Epstein and Diddy, claiming a broader conspiracy among media elites to perpetuate narratives that shield the powerful.

By Alki David | June 25, 2025

“When journalism is reduced to loyalty, it morphs into propaganda.” —Shockya Editorial

Dissecting the Ethics of Reporting: A Call for Accountability
Khadeeja Safdar’s recent narrative featured in the Wall Street Journal, which implicates me (Alki David) concerning payments to figures like Lisa Bloom and the Elizabeth Taylor Estate, transcends the bounds of responsible journalism—it exemplifies a deliberate endeavor to spread misinformation.

Her piece, reminiscent of the monotony of recycled press updates and legal chatter, serves merely to divert attention from an increasingly crumbling network of media, legal, and entertainment power players currently facing scrutiny in courtrooms worldwide. While Safdar presents herself as an impartial chronicler, it is evident that she is part of an orchestrated media initiative designed not to illuminate truths but rather to conceal them.

Safdar’s Underlying Objective: Shaping the Narrative
Let’s analyze the recurring themes in her reporting:

On Jeffrey Epstein: Safdar’s articles for WSJ conspicuously avoid mentioning influential players like Les Wexner, Rupert Murdoch, and Bill Gates, erasing critical connections and oversight that warrant public attention.

On Michael Jackson: There’s a glaring absence of coverage regarding the 1999 Anaheim incident and the 2006 Rancho Fiesta assault—both events tied to coordinated attacks against Jackson by factions within Hollywood, details of which are archived on Shockya.com and TVMix.com with strong testimonials and evidence.

On Diddy: Safdar has notably avoided addressing Diddy’s connections to the exposed trafficking ring currently under litigation despite possessing access to substantial evidence and survivor accounts.

Thus, what prevails in her narratives? References to payouts, deflections, and calculated distractions that sidestep the pressing issues.

The Murdoch Syndicate: An Instrument of Media Suppression
Oversight for Khadeeja Safdar’s work falls under Rupert Murdoch, owner of The Wall Street Journal, Fox News, The Sun, and an array of other media outlets wielded to suppress critical revelations of systemic abuse, trafficking, and coercion. Collaborators within this network have included:

- Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (David Boies)
- Lisa Bloom and Gloria Allred
- Tom Girardi and Michael Avenatti
- Anthony Pellicano, Diddy, and Jeffrey Epstein

This coalition can be referred to as the Modern-Day National Crime Syndicate, responsible for calculated takedowns, abuse, extortion, and targeting those brave enough to voice dissent. Historical attacks on Michael Jackson, alongside efforts to silence whistleblowers like myself and Rose McGowan, unveil a common tactic from this playbook—Murdoch’s journalists act as proactive participants, not idly observing.

Revealing the Inconvenient Truth
Consider the 1999 Anaheim Incident:
Michael Jackson was ensnared in a carefully orchestrated public event leading to his assault, attended by figures including Anthony Pellicano, Lisa Bloom, and others. Key witnesses have provided critical testimony.

Similarly, the 2006 Rancho Fiesta Incident mirrored the previous one, involving Gloria Allred and network-linked agents, including Khadeeja Safdar as a so-called observer.

Fast forward to today: The Epstein-Diddy Nexus.
Current legal proceedings across various jurisdictions unveil Diddy’s brazen involvement in trafficking operations stretching from the entertainment industry to international locales, with evidence insinuating his ties to Epstein's posthumous cover-up—a scheme shielded by the likes of WSJ and Murdoch’s media empire.

Safdar’s Silence Equates to Complicity
Khadeeja Safdar is aware of this content. She has conversed with survivors and viewed court documents, video footage, and testimonies firsthand. Yet, she notably refrains from publishing these verifiable truths—not due to any lack of credibility, but because the revelations implicate her superiors.

Her writings resemble PR campaigns, deployed strategically when the syndicate seeks an escape from scrutiny. While genuine survivors mourn their losses and witnesses face threats or worse, Safdar dedicates her focus to payment discussions—a narrative flattering to her journalists' benefactors.

Judicial Scrutiny is Upon Us
Across various international jurisdictions, judges are meticulously examining evidence poised to expose this extensive network, with multiple legal filings targeting The Wall Street Journal, scrutinizing its endeavors to suppress whistleblowers.

Henceforth, let us acknowledge this:
The era of media immunity is concluding. No longer can the pay-to-hush model persist. Platforms like CBSYouSuck.com, Shockya, and others remain vigilant—methodically revealing the truth, name by name, instance by instance.

This Change is Here
Khadeeja Safdar is not just a journalist; she embodies a crisis operative, centralized in extinguishing truth while serving as a mouthpiece for the complicit. Failing to address the power dynamics surrounding Epstein, Diddy, and the protective media apparatus constitutes an offense against the very journalism she purports to uphold.

However, the narrative is irretrievably shifting. Authority now lies with us—the survivors, the truth-seekers, and the diligent reporters who refuse to be corrupted. Our ranks are ample. And we are unyieldingly attentive.

For more detailed evidence and testimony:
CBSYouSuck.com, Shockya.com, TVMix.com