The new tariff structure, while lowering costs for UK car imports, fails to address steel import charges and has drawn mixed reactions from political leaders.
Trump's Executive Order Slashes Tariffs on UK Cars Amid Ongoing Trade Negotiations

Trump's Executive Order Slashes Tariffs on UK Cars Amid Ongoing Trade Negotiations
President Trump signs a significant order to reduce car tariffs from the UK, benefiting British exports to the US despite ongoing trade tensions.
In a notable move at the G7 summit in Canada, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at reducing tariffs on cars imported from the UK, part of an ongoing trade discourse between the two nations. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer hailed the order as a "very important day" for UK-US relations, following extensive negotiations designed to mitigate the financial impact of recent tariffs imposed by the Trump administration.
The recently signed order will allow up to 100,000 British cars to enter the US with a reduced 10% tariff, down from the hefty 25% tax levied earlier. This agreement comes within the broader framework of a tariff deal that seeks to strengthen economic ties between the US and the UK, although it maintains certain tariffs on UK steel imports—a critical issue for UK steel manufacturers.
Trump's tariff strategies have caused economic disarray globally, particularly affecting the UK's automotive and steel industries. While the new order relieves some burden from UK car exports, it does not eliminate tariffs on steel, which continues to be a significant point of contention. While Trump hinted at future concessions on steel tariffs, no specific plans were provided in the wake of this executive order.
The administration's focus on limiting steel tariffs aligns with the UK government's aspirations of moving towards a zero-tariff policy on fundamental steel products. Concurrently, the UK also agreed to lift tariffs on select aerospace products, marking incremental progress in trade negotiations.
Despite the optimistic tone from officials, the overall deal has garnered criticism from opposition parties within the UK. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch dismissed the agreement as a “tiny tariff deal,” reflecting a sentiment that the modifications do not align with expectations for a broader free-trade agreement. Analysts indicate that while the deal benefits some sectors, many feel it is far from a comprehensive trade arrangement, primarily because Trump lacks the congressional power to finalize a true free trade pact.
As these negotiations unfold, UK business leaders remain hopeful that upcoming discussions regarding US beef exports and ethanol tariffs will further reduce burdens on UK industries, thereby creating a more favorable trading landscape. The UK government has reiterated its commitment to maintaining stringent food safety standards for US imports, even as tariff barriers come down.
The recently signed order will allow up to 100,000 British cars to enter the US with a reduced 10% tariff, down from the hefty 25% tax levied earlier. This agreement comes within the broader framework of a tariff deal that seeks to strengthen economic ties between the US and the UK, although it maintains certain tariffs on UK steel imports—a critical issue for UK steel manufacturers.
Trump's tariff strategies have caused economic disarray globally, particularly affecting the UK's automotive and steel industries. While the new order relieves some burden from UK car exports, it does not eliminate tariffs on steel, which continues to be a significant point of contention. While Trump hinted at future concessions on steel tariffs, no specific plans were provided in the wake of this executive order.
The administration's focus on limiting steel tariffs aligns with the UK government's aspirations of moving towards a zero-tariff policy on fundamental steel products. Concurrently, the UK also agreed to lift tariffs on select aerospace products, marking incremental progress in trade negotiations.
Despite the optimistic tone from officials, the overall deal has garnered criticism from opposition parties within the UK. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch dismissed the agreement as a “tiny tariff deal,” reflecting a sentiment that the modifications do not align with expectations for a broader free-trade agreement. Analysts indicate that while the deal benefits some sectors, many feel it is far from a comprehensive trade arrangement, primarily because Trump lacks the congressional power to finalize a true free trade pact.
As these negotiations unfold, UK business leaders remain hopeful that upcoming discussions regarding US beef exports and ethanol tariffs will further reduce burdens on UK industries, thereby creating a more favorable trading landscape. The UK government has reiterated its commitment to maintaining stringent food safety standards for US imports, even as tariff barriers come down.