Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard's nomination as director of national intelligence has ignited debate over her controversial political history and ties.
Tulsi Gabbard: Trump's Controversial Pick for Director of National Intelligence

Tulsi Gabbard: Trump's Controversial Pick for Director of National Intelligence
Trump's appointment of Tulsi Gabbard raises eyebrows amid accusations of Russian propaganda alignment.
Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman, has been nominated by President-elect Donald Trump to take the role of director of national intelligence, overseeing critical agencies such as the CIA, FBI, and NSA. While this high-stakes position involves managing a vast budget exceeding $70 billion and supervising 18 intelligence agencies, Gabbard's lack of traditional experience in intelligence has sparked intense scrutiny and concern.
Critics have pointed to Gabbard's past comments and affiliations, suggesting that she has at times echoed Russian talking points. Abigail Spanberger, a Democratic congresswoman and member of the House Intelligence Committee, voiced her disapproval on social media, stating she finds Gabbard "ill-prepared and unqualified," accusing her of engaging with conspiracy theories and authoritarian figures such as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Gabbard’s rise in politics is notable; she made history as the youngest person ever elected to the Hawaii State Legislature at 21 and represented Hawaii in Congress between 2013 and 2021, being the first Hindu to hold that position. Initially a proponent of progressive policies such as healthcare for all and gun control, Gabbard switched her political allegiance in 2022 after denouncing the Democratic Party, labeling it an "elitist cabal of warmongers."
Her contentious remarks about Syria during her 2020 presidential campaign have drawn particular ire, especially her defense of Assad and skepticism regarding the Syrian regime’s culpability in chemical attacks. She has also stirred controversy with statements regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine, suggesting that U.S. missteps contributed to the conflict and endorsing the idea of U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine.
The fallout extends beyond U.S. borders; Russian media has taken interest in her nomination, framing it as potentially detrimental to Ukraine as diplomatic relations become increasingly strained. As Gabbard awaits confirmation from the Senate, her suitability for the director of national intelligence remains hotly debated among lawmakers and analysts alike.