Skepticism Looms Over DR Congo-Rwanda Peace Agreement Amidst Ongoing Conflict**

The newly signed peace deal between DR Congo and Rwanda faces skepticism, particularly from residents of Goma, who question the exclusion of the M23 group and the deal's efficacy amid ongoing conflict and humanitarian concerns.**

The recent peace agreement signed between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) and Rwanda in Washington has been met with skepticism, especially in the rebel-controlled city of Goma, where many residents are questioning the effectiveness and inclusivity of the initiative. Former Congolese president Joseph Kabila dismissed the accord, characterizing it as "nothing more than a trade agreement" lacking substantial commitments.

The agreement, which was finalized on Friday, includes provisions for the "disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration" of armed groups in the eastern region of DR Congo, though it falls short of detailing how these processes will be executed. Amidst concerns over Rwanda's alleged support for the M23 rebel group, which has recently taken control of significant territory in DR Congo, Kabila emphasized the absence of M23 representation at the signing event, leading to speculation about the legitimacy and intentions of the process.

Local sentiments in Goma reflect a widespread frustration with the ongoing violence, which has led to thousands of deaths and widespread displacement. A resident expressed disbelief at the exclusion of the M23 during the peace talks, suggesting that true peace cannot be achieved without all parties involved. Similarly, a motorbike taxi operator echoed the urgency of the populace for immediate peace rather than diplomatic gestures.

Concerns are also raised by experts regarding the agreement's inadequacies, particularly its neglect of human rights issues, as pointed out by Sam Zarifi from Physicians for Human Rights. He criticized the deal for overlooking the realities of proxy wars and the continuing perpetration of human rights violations.

Conversely, some hold a more optimistic view. Stephanie Marungu, a leader of a humanitarian organization in Goma, sees the signing as a hopeful opportunity for increased stability and improved aid delivery, although she concedes that implementation will pose significant challenges.

As the situation unfolds, residents remain wary of potential exploitation arising from the deal, fearing that it might benefit a select few at the expense of the local population's well-being. With critical minerals located in eastern DR Congo drawing international interest, questions linger about the ultimate beneficiaries of the peace accord.