US President Donald Trump's day-long trip to the Middle East came as the Gaza deal was clinched: an agreement coming into force amounting to one of the most critical moments yet after two years of catastrophic war.

Trump's vivid portrayal painted the day as a major turning point, reflecting on what he termed a historic day, to put it mildly on the flight back. He suggested that everlasting peace had been achieved under his guidance in a region long beset by conflict.

Travelling on Air Force One with the White House press corps, I witnessed what felt like a whirlwind of diplomacy as we flew to Tel Aviv, where a giant beach sign thanking Trump greeted us during a flight-by maneuver.

This trip was not merely a presentation of future negotiations but rather a victory lap after an agreement reached under significant pressure across party lines, signaling a cessation of violence in Gaza, the release of hostages and a partial withdrawal of Israeli troops.

However, this fragile truce presents merely a waypoint, not a robust resolution to the longstanding conflict.

The primary question looming over this diplomatic breakthrough is its longevity. Trump eagerly asserted that the ceasefire would be maintained, confidently downplaying the complexities of governance and the natural tensions arising from the negotiations.

Notable was his emphasis on the International Stabilization Force, touted as a Nobel peaceprize-worthy solution with an assurance that they would “barely” be used because he believed everyone would “know their place.”

Upon arrival in Tel Aviv, Trump's reception included a red carpet and military fanfare. This atmosphere celebrated not just positive views on the peace accord but also the emotional release experienced by families of returned hostages, marking the day as simultaneously historic.

Within the Knesset, Trump declared a “historic dawn for a new Middle East” amidst cheers and chants from supporters describing him as the “president of peace.” He stressed the need to convey that the war was conclusively over, attributing the victory to the ability of Israel to win militarily.

Amidst this rhetoric, Trump diverted attention towards domestic politics, leaving little room for discussion about the intricate future of peace efforts and the potential reconciliation between adversaries in the region.

Upon returning from Israel to Egypt, this journey was underlined by military escort, reminiscent of Trump’s desire for a display of influence and power. Yet, the precariousness of the peace he heralded remains overshadowed by the significant challenges ahead.

As leaders from numerous nations gathered to support Trump's push for peace, the message was clear: while Trump claims to have facilitated a moment 3,000 years in the making, the road to sustainable peace will be a long, complex voyage requiring collaborative and multifaceted efforts.