The ocean has always been a significant part of Glen Butler's life. As a surfer for 50 years, he recalls rarely worrying about sharks. You're aware you're stepping into their environment, so you're cautious, the 61-year-old shared. However, his perception drastically changed after the tragic death of fellow surfer Mercury Psillakis, who was killed by a great white shark at Long Reef last month.

Butler expressed, It's shaken us up a bit, especially knowing Mercury, who was well-known in the community. You'd always say g'day to him. The incident has reignited the ongoing debate about the safety measures at Australian beaches, specifically focusing on shark nets utilized by the New South Wales (NSW) government.

Shark nets, rolled out each summer at popular beaches, have become a point of contention. While they are designed to protect swimmers from shark attacks, many conservationists argue they do more harm than good by entangling other marine species and failing to effectively prevent sharks from reaching swimmers.

Australia has some of the world's best beaches, with over 80% of its population living along the coast. However, with increasing shark sightings and the recent spate of unprovoked attacks, including four fatalities this year, public fears are growing.

Critics of shark nets, like University of Sydney Professor Chris Pepin-Neff, claim they provide an illusion of safety rather than effective protection. In fact, about 40% of sharks caught in these nets are found trying to escape back to the shore.

This incident comes just as the government was considering scaling back the use of nets in favor of alternative measures such as drumlines and drones. Despite their drawbacks, the nets remain popular among anxious beachgoers, complicating the push for change.

As discussions continue, the safety of bathers versus the ecological impact of shark nets remains a complex and contentious issue in Australia.