The decision follows Trump's earlier revocation of Joe Biden's clearance and aims to limit access to classified information for several high-profile figures associated with the Biden administration and legal challenges against Trump.
Trump Strips Security Clearances from Political Rivals and Critics

Trump Strips Security Clearances from Political Rivals and Critics
In a controversial move, Trump has revoked security clearances from former political rivals and critics, including Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton.
In a sweeping decision emblematic of ongoing political tensions, former President Donald Trump has revoked security clearances for a number of political adversaries, including his former opponents Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton, as well as top officials from the Biden administration. Trump has stated that he determined it is "no longer in the national interest" for these individuals to access classified information. This move is part of a broader strategy that began with the revocation of Joe Biden’s security clearance earlier this year, which Trump claims is justified by what he perceives as Biden's "erratic behavior."
The targeted individuals, such as former Secretary of State Antony Blinken and national security advisor Jake Sullivan, now face restrictions on accessing classified briefings and secure government facilities, a privilege typically afforded to former presidents and senior officials. Interestingly, Trump’s actions have also included revoking clearances for political critics from his own party, notably Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, both of whom were instrumental in the investigation into Trump’s actions surrounding the January 6 Capitol riot.
Moreover, Trump has turned his sights on legal adversaries, stripping security clearances from figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who have been involved in legal actions against him. Legal experts and past officials view these revocations as a symbolic gesture, although the effects on access to sensitive materials could complicate their work on ongoing cases.
The revocations have been met with derision on social media. Individuals affected by this order, such as attorney Norm Eisen and former official Alexander Vindman, have criticized Trump's decision, expressing that it carries little real consequence given their long-standing clearance statuses or ongoing legal battles. Notably, previous actions taken by Trump regarding security clearances date back to accusations against former intelligence officials who, he claimed, had interfered in the 2020 election in favor of Biden, without providing evidence.
With this latest round of security clearance revocations, Trump continues to navigate the complexities of political accountability and influence, raising questions about the precedents set by his administration and the broader implications for U.S. governance and democracy.