In a recent escalation of his ongoing feud with academic institutions, President Donald Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status, following a decision to freeze $2 billion in federal funding. This move comes amid demands from the White House aimed at reshaping how universities handle issues of antisemitism and maintaining control over their operations.
**Trump Targets Harvard Over Antisemitism Policies and Funding Freeze**

**Trump Targets Harvard Over Antisemitism Policies and Funding Freeze**
*US President's Threats to Universities Spark Controversy Amidst Federal Funding Freeze*
Harvard University has found itself at the forefront of a political storm, as President Trump has openly called for the prestigious institution to lose its tax-exempt status after it rejected the administration's mandates to alter hiring, admissions, and educational practices. Early Tuesday, Trump took to social media to express his discontent, suggesting that Harvard should be taxed as a political entity if it continues to embrace what he terms "political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting 'sickness.'"
This threat is particularly significant, as losing tax-exempt status could cost Harvard millions yearly, given its vast $53 billion endowment. The current backlash from the White House stems from Harvard's refusal to comply with demands for increased scrutiny of student opinions and greater government oversight of its academic freedom—requests the university characterized as an infringement on its independence and First Amendment rights.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reiterated Trump's demands, insisting on an apology from Harvard for its perceived tolerance of antisemitism, amidst accusations that major universities have neglected the protection of Jewish students during recent protests linked to global conflicts.
As tensions mount and other elite universities, like Columbia, navigate similar pressures, the broader implications of Trump’s actions on academic freedom and governance remain to be seen. University administrations are grappling with the balance of maintaining independence while facing threats of funding withdrawal, indicative of a larger trend of rising skepticism toward higher education in the American political landscape.
This threat is particularly significant, as losing tax-exempt status could cost Harvard millions yearly, given its vast $53 billion endowment. The current backlash from the White House stems from Harvard's refusal to comply with demands for increased scrutiny of student opinions and greater government oversight of its academic freedom—requests the university characterized as an infringement on its independence and First Amendment rights.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reiterated Trump's demands, insisting on an apology from Harvard for its perceived tolerance of antisemitism, amidst accusations that major universities have neglected the protection of Jewish students during recent protests linked to global conflicts.
As tensions mount and other elite universities, like Columbia, navigate similar pressures, the broader implications of Trump’s actions on academic freedom and governance remain to be seen. University administrations are grappling with the balance of maintaining independence while facing threats of funding withdrawal, indicative of a larger trend of rising skepticism toward higher education in the American political landscape.