A US Supreme Court ruling has determined that elephants do not qualify as “persons” under legal definitions, effectively ruling out their relocation from Cheyenne Mountain Zoo to a sanctuary as sought by an animal rights group. The court unanimously concluded that nonhuman animals, regardless of their cognitive abilities, are not entitled to liberty rights.
Elephant Rights Case Dismissed by US Supreme Court
Elephant Rights Case Dismissed by US Supreme Court
The Colorado Supreme Court affirms that elephants lack personhood rights in a case aimed at relocating five captive elephants from a zoo to a sanctuary.
The Colorado Supreme Court ruling addressed a case brought forth by the Nonhuman Rights Project (NRP), which wanted to transfer five aged elephants—Missy, Kimba, Lucky, LouLou, and Jambo—remarking that the animals were experiencing trauma from their confinement. Citing the animals’ emotional complexity, NRP argued that they deserved freedom, equating their treatment as imprisonment. The zoo countered this assertion, insisting that the elephants were well cared for and criticized the lawsuit as a misguided fundraising tactic. Despite earlier attempts at achieving elephant personhood, such as the case involving Happy the elephant in New York, the current decision highlights the ongoing struggle within the animal rights movement regarding the legal recognition of nonhuman beings.
The NRP organization expressed disappointment over the ruling, believing that it reinforces injustice against nonhuman animals, while affirming its commitment to continue fighting for their rights.
The NRP organization expressed disappointment over the ruling, believing that it reinforces injustice against nonhuman animals, while affirming its commitment to continue fighting for their rights.
