New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters has terminated Phil Goff's position as High Commissioner to the UK due to remarks made about President Trump's understanding of history, comparing current geopolitical tensions to past events.
New Zealand Dismisses UK Envoy Over Controversial Remarks on Trump
New Zealand Dismisses UK Envoy Over Controversial Remarks on Trump
Phil Goff, the High Commissioner to the UK, is dismissed following comments questioning Trump’s historical awareness.
In an unexpected diplomatic move, New Zealand has dismissed its senior envoy to the United Kingdom, Phil Goff, after he made comments regarding US President Donald Trump's historical knowledge. The remarks were made during an event in London, where Goff drew parallels between the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine and the infamous Munich Agreement of 1938, which allowed Adolf Hitler to annex Czechoslovakia.
Goff reminisced about Sir Winston Churchill's denunciation of the Munich Agreement and then posed a rhetorical question about Trump, stating, "President Trump has restored the bust of Churchill to the Oval Office. But do you think he really understands history?" This statement sparked backlash and was deemed "deeply disappointing" by New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters, ultimately leading to Goff’s dismissal.
Peters emphasized that Goff’s comments did not reflect the official stance of the New Zealand government. "When you are in that position you represent the government and the policies of the day, you're not able to free think; you are the face of New Zealand," Peters reportedly told local media. He reiterated the importance of diplomacy and professionalism in representing the country.
Goff had held the role of High Commissioner since January 2023 and had previously served in various government roles, including foreign affairs and defense. His dismissal has drawn criticism from some, including former Prime Minister Helen Clark, who described the rationale for his sacking as a "very thin excuse." Clark noted that parallels between past and present geopolitical strategies have been widely discussed at international forums.
The incident underscores the sensitive nature of diplomatic positions, especially concerning comments made about foreign leaders and historical events.
