In a significant legal decision, a South African court dismissed claims of a white genocide against the white minority as unfounded, coming amid rising political rhetoric from figures in the USA. The ruling halted a $2.1 million donation to the controversial Boerelegioen, a group advocating for racial separation.
South African Court Refutes 'White Genocide' Claims as Baseless

South African Court Refutes 'White Genocide' Claims as Baseless
A court ruling in South Africa deems accusations of a white genocide as fictitious and blocks funding to a white supremacist group.
A South African court has dismissed allegations of a so-called "white genocide" in the country as "clearly imagined" and "not real." This ruling coincides with heightened scrutiny of rhetoric surrounding the treatment of South Africa’s white minority, notably statements made by figures such as US President Donald Trump and entrepreneur Elon Musk. The court's decision specifically blocked a proposed donation of $2.1 million (approximately £1.7 million) intended for the white supremacist group Boerelegioen.
Grantland Michael Bray sought to bequeath this considerable sum to help propagate messages of racial hatred and separation. However, the court ruled that this request was invalid, vague, and contrary to public policy. Trump's claims of an alleged "large-scale killing of farmers" in South Africa and Musk's criticism of "racist ownership laws" have lent fuel to the fire igniting such narratives, which have little basis in verified data.
The legal action was initiated by Mr. Bray's siblings, who argued that their brother had become fixated on the idea of a looming genocide of white people during the last decade of his life. They contended that his paranoia was exacerbated by exposure to racially charged online content and his pre-existing racist beliefs. Judge Rosheni Allie summarized this escalation in Bray's viewpoint and noted that he had met with members of Boerelegioen in 2020, subsequently donating approximately $326,000 (£258,000) in gold coins to the organization.
Judge Allie stated that Mr. Bray's will was vague as to which of the multiple entities named Boerelegioen was the intended recipient of his funds. Although the group claims to provide security and training services across communities without racial exclusions, the judge found that Bray's assertions revealed an intention to channel funds towards a cause perceived as advocating for racial violence.
Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order to freeze financial aid to South Africa, citing concerns over new land seizure laws empowered by the government. In American politics, the plight of white South African farmers has consistently emerged as a rallying point for right-wing factions. Despite persistent claims regarding the systematic targeting of the Afrikaner minority, crime statistics depict a different reality, with recent data revealing that of the nearly 7,000 murders in the country over a three-month span, only a fraction involved farmers, much less confirming a narrative of genocide.
This ruling highlights the complex interplay of race, politics, and public perception in South Africa and abroad, underscoring the necessity for nuanced discourse grounded in verified evidence.