The administration's scrutiny of habeas corpus comes as judges intervene in high-profile cases of detained individuals, including foreign students. A federal judge recently ordered the release of a Turkish student held for six weeks and another Columbia University student advocating for Palestinian rights. These developments have sparked debate over the administration's interpretation of US law, with several experts contesting Miller's assertions that habeas corpus is merely a privilege.

Miller's statement about Congress stripping courts of jurisdiction in immigration matters looms large, as more civil cases challenge the deportation drives of the administration. Trump's promise to expedite the removal of millions of undocumented immigrants continues to clash with judicial oversight and procedural fairness.

While Trump has not publicly advocated for the suspension of habeas corpus, sources suggest he is involved in discussions about mitigating legal injunctions against immigration enforcement. The concept of habeas corpus has historical precedents in the US and remains a critical safeguard in the legal system. The legality and potential consequences of suspending such a right remain uncertain, raising questions about presidential authority versus legislative checks and balances.

As the White House navigates these complex legal waters, the implications of potentially suspending habeas corpus may affect countless lives and heighten tensions within an already polarized political landscape.