As the Trump administration moves to slash the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) staff dramatically, numerous programs abroad face disruptions. This has prompted criticism from former officials, legal actions from unions, and concerns about the ramifications for global humanitarian efforts.
Major Dismantling of USAID Staffing Amid Trump Administration Cuts

Major Dismantling of USAID Staffing Amid Trump Administration Cuts
Trump’s administration plans to drastically reduce USAID's workforce from 10,000 to fewer than 300, igniting backlash and legal challenges.
In a move that could reshape the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Trump administration plans to reduce its workforce drastically from approximately 10,000 staff members to fewer than 300. As part of this initiative, most non-essential personnel will be placed on administrative leave starting midnight Friday, affecting many employees stationed abroad. An online notice details preparations for return travel and non-essential contractor terminations.
The cuts, touted by presidential adviser Elon Musk, aim to realign USAID's priorities with the administration’s "America First" agenda, which critics argue is jeopardizing vital foreign aid programs. The agency, considered the largest global provider of humanitarian assistance, operates in over 60 countries with contractors performing much of the work. Allegations of taxpayer waste have fueled public skepticism towards foreign aid, particularly among Republican constituents.
Union representatives, including the American Foreign Service Association (AFSA), claim that only 294 individuals have been classified as essential staff, and they have initiated legal action against the administration. The lawsuit highlights that attempts to dismantle USAID are unconstitutional without Congressional approval and calls for an independent director to oversee the agency's future.
Critics, including former USAID chiefs, assert that reducing USAID’s capacity sends harmful signals regarding U.S. commitment to international humanitarian crises. They argue that recent actions may lead to dangerous implications for global public health and safety.
In response, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi condemned the cuts as detrimental and suggested that reform of the agency could be accomplished without jeopardizing its mission. Concerns about impacts on local NGOs reliant on USAID funding have emerged, with reports of job losses and health service disruptions in countries like Kenya.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio insists the U.S. will continue its foreign aid involvement, but only for programs that align with national interests and can be justified before the taxpayer. The situation continues to escalate, with fears that the changes could lead to a humanitarian crisis and unraveling of hard-fought international partnerships.