FIFA's 2034 World Cup Evaluation: Saudi Arabia's Human Rights Potential Under Scrutiny

FIFA's evaluation awarded Saudi Arabia’s bid for the 2034 World Cup an impressive score, citing its potential as a catalyst for human rights reforms. However, critics decry the assessment as a "whitewash," arguing that hosting the tournament could exacerbate existing violations unless substantial reforms are enacted.

FIFA has officially assessed Saudi Arabia's bid to host the men's World Cup in 2034, rating it an impressive 4.2 out of 5, the highest score ever granted to a host nation. This evaluation has led to discussions surrounding the potential for human rights reforms in the kingdom, historically known for its oppressive practices. The assessment labeled the human rights risks as "medium," expressing optimism that the event could serve as a catalyst for positive changes.

Despite the high score, human rights organizations reacted sharply against FIFA's findings. They argue that the evaluation fails to adequately address the country's dismal record, including the execution of numerous individuals this year, severe restrictions on free speech, and systemic discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation. Amnesty International has emphatically called for immediate reforms before any hosting agreements are finalized.

In its report, FIFA emphasized the need for further legal reforms within Saudi Arabia, noting the nation's commitment to improving its human rights situation. Key areas of concern, according to the report, include safety and security, labor rights, gender equality, and freedom of expression. However, critics assert that the promised reforms lack meaningful commitments, and without substantial changes, exploitation and discrimination are likely to mar the tournament.

The urgency of these discussions is heightened due to Saudi Arabia's significant investments in sports as part of its Vision 2030 initiative. While the government asserts that these investments are intended to enhance tourism and inspire active lifestyles, the underlying concerns regarding human rights abuses remain omnipresent.

In addition to human rights discussions, environmental implications also arise from the upcoming tournaments. Commitments made by FIFA regarding sustainability and environmental assessments, including the potential considerable carbon footprint from extensive air travel between various host locations, are causing significant concern among activists.

FIFA plans to formally ratify both the 2030 and 2034 World Cup hosts on December 11. The scrutiny surrounding the 2034 World Cup's bidding process indicates that the road ahead may be fraught with challenges, particularly as advocates emphasize the need for urgent reforms to protect human rights within Saudi Arabia before the tournament can be deemed a success.