WASHINGTON (AP) — In a tense subcommittee hearing Tuesday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick admitted that he met with Jeffrey Epstein on two occasions after the financier's conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008. This contradicted Lutnick's earlier claims that he had severed ties with Epstein in 2005.

Under questioning from Democratic lawmakers, Lutnick attempted to downplay the significance of these meetings, describing their relationship as limited to a few emails and two meetings.

“I did not have any relationship with him. I barely had anything to do with him,” Lutnick stated, despite evidence from newly released Epstein files that contradict his assertions.

This admission has intensified calls from both sides of the political aisle for Lutnick's resignation. Lawmakers expressed their concern that Lutnick may have misled Congress and the public regarding his connections to Epstein.

During the hearing, Lutnick acknowledged that he and his family dined with Epstein on his private island in 2012 and recalled another meeting at Epstein’s residence in 2011. As a result, he faces scrutiny not only for his past associations with Epstein but also for the stark contrast between his previous statements and recent revelations.

Several lawmakers are demanding Lutnick resign from his position, emphasizing accountability for those associated with Epstein's alleged misconduct. Senator Chris Van Hollen pointed out that while Lutnick may not have engaged in any wrongdoing with Epstein directly, misleading statements in light of the recent evidence present serious concerns.

Among the bipartisan critics are House members involved in efforts to release additional Epstein documentation. Representative Thomas Massie and California Democrat Ro Khanna have publicly stated that Lutnick’s position is untenable as the evidence mounts against him.

Khanna stated, We need to make a decision in this country. Are we going to allow powerful individuals who have faced no consequences to continue operating within our government? The ongoing discussion around Lutnick’s accountability signifies a growing demand for transparency and integrity in public office, particularly in the wake of the Epstein files.