FCC Implements Ban on New Foreign-Made Drones Amid National Security Concerns

Tue Dec 23 2025 10:02:28 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

The Federal Communications Commission has announced a ban on the import of new foreign-made drones, particularly targeting major companies like DJI and Autel. This decision is driven by national security concerns as the U.S. prepares for upcoming major events, including the World Cup and the Olympics.

In a move to bolster national security, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has prohibited new foreign-made drones from entering the U.S. market, specifically targeting popular Chinese manufacturers like DJI and Autel. This decision follows a Congressional mandate expressing concerns over the potential risks these drones pose. While some industry leaders support the move to increase domestic production, the decision has also faced criticism for its broad application, potentially impacting a wide array of foreign drone technologies used across various sectors.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Communications Commission on Monday announced a ban on new foreign-made drones, effectively excluding popular Chinese brands such as DJI and Autel from the U.S. market.

The decision follows a year after Congress passed a defense bill that raised serious national security concerns regarding foreign-made drones, which are extensively utilized in areas like agriculture, mapping, law enforcement, and filmmaking in the United States.

According to the bill, these Chinese companies would be prevented from selling new drone models in the U.S. if a review determined they represented a national security threat. This review's deadline was set for December 23.

The FCC stated that its findings indicated that all drones and critical components produced in foreign countries presented unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of U.S. persons. However, certain drones or components could be exempt if approved by the Pentagon or the Department of Homeland Security.

Major upcoming events, including the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, were cited by the FCC as justification for taking action against potential drone-related threats posed by criminal elements, hostile foreign actors, and terrorists.

Michael Robbins, the president and CEO of the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI), expressed support for the ban, emphasizing the necessity for America to strengthen its domestic drone manufacturing capabilities and lessen dependence on foreign technologies.

Recent history underscores why the United States must increase domestic drone production and secure its supply chains, Robbins noted, referencing China's willingness to restrict essential materials, such as rare earth elements.

DJI issued a statement expressing disappointment with the FCC's decision. The company argued that concerns regarding its data security have not been substantiated with evidence and are reflective of protectionist measures.

In Texas, Gene Robinson, who relies on a fleet of nine DJI drones for law enforcement training and forensic analysis, lamented the negative impact of the ban. However, he acknowledged the necessity of shifting the manufacturing focus back to the U.S.

In contrast, Arthur Erickson, CEO of Hylio, a U.S.-based drone manufacturing company, views the ban as an opportunity for American businesses. He anticipates increased investments in domestic drone production but also expressed concerns about the FCC's sweeping approach to banning all foreign-made drones.

The situation highlights a complex intersection of innovation, security, and market dynamics as the U.S. navigates its reliance on foreign technology in an increasingly competitive global landscape.