South Carolina Senate Considers Controversial Abortion Bill with Severe Penalties

Tue Nov 18 2025 14:02:38 GMT+0200 (Eastern European Standard Time)

A new legislative proposal in South Carolina could impose harsh prison sentences for women undergoing abortions, raising concerns over reproductive rights and healthcare regulations.

The South Carolina Senate is deliberating a bill that would criminalize abortions, allowing judges to sentence women to up to 30 years in prison. The legislation aims to enforce strict penalties on both patients and providers, marking a significant shift in abortion regulations following last year's Supreme Court decision. Opponents argue that the bill threatens women's health and autonomy, while proponents assert it is necessary to protect life. This proposal, if passed, would be the most restrictive abortion law in the United States.

COLUMBIA, S.C. — A contentious bill in South Carolina proposes harsh penalties for women who seek abortions, including potential prison sentences of up to 30 years. This bill, which also threatens to restrict access to IUDs and in vitro fertilization, is being discussed by a select group of state senators.

If passed, it would represent the most severe abortion restrictions enacted in the U.S. since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, paving the way for states to impose stricter regulations on reproductive health.

The proposed legislation would outlaw all abortions unless the woman's life is at risk, starkly contrasting with current state law that permits abortions until around six weeks of pregnancy, a timeframe when many women are unaware they are pregnant. Current law allows exceptions for victims of rape and incest up to 12 weeks.

Additionally, under the new bill, women who undergo abortions and anyone assisting them could face imprisonment for decades, making it unique compared to restrictions in other states. The bill could potentially ban contraceptive methods that prevent implantation of fertilized eggs, further complicating options for reproductive health.

Senator Richard Cash, a Republican and the bill's sponsor, acknowledged complications in restricting contraceptive methods and the advice physicians can give, but has not indicated what alterations might be made to the proposal. The subcommittee tasked with reviewing the bill comprises six Republicans, raising questions about its trajectory.

Abortion remains a divisive issue, particularly in conservative states. South Carolina Citizens for Life, a prominent anti-abortion organization, has expressed opposition to the bill, arguing that women seeking abortions should not be punished and are often victims themselves. Conversely, groups like Equal Protection South Carolina argue that all abortions constitute murder and should be treated accordingly.

This proposal, set for further review, mirrors a national trend of escalating abortion restrictions as states navigate the aftermath of recent Supreme Court rulings.