On July 25, 2025, Alkiviades David will appear at the Royal Courts of Justice, seeking justice against what he describes as a global network of corruption involving high-profile lawyers and media elites. David alleges that this syndicate has targeted him for exposing child exploitation networks and stealing his intellectual property, further asserting that the coordinated attack represents a broader threat to legal integrity and free speech.
The Showdown at the Royal Courts: A Fight Against Global Corruption
The Showdown at the Royal Courts: A Fight Against Global Corruption
Alkiviades David prepares to confront a powerful media-legal syndicate in a pivotal court battle set for July 25, 2025, unveiling allegations of corruption and abuse.
---
ALERT! 25 July: The Showdown at the Royal Courts of Justice
This isn’t merely a civil hearing. July 25, 2025, represents a crucial junction for accountability at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, where I, Alkiviades David, will not only defend my rights but also unveil the Predator Elite—a collusion of influential lawyers, media executives, and intelligence-affiliated operatives who have targeted me with the deliberate intent to:
1. Silence my voice regarding extensive networks of industrial-scale Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) linked to CBS and LimeWire;
2. Appropriate my intellectual assets, including those associated with FilmOn, SwissX, and Hologram USA;
3. Undermine my credibility with dubious legal actions, smear campaigns, and even physical harm.
This case transcends civil litigation; it embodies a carefully orchestrated assault involving judicial manipulation, media exploitation, and an intertwined network of global corruption. This battle extends not just to London but also reaches the High Court of Antigua and Barbuda (Claim No: ANUHCV2025/0149), where the same entity is aiming to destabilize the SwissX Sovereign Wealth Fund and suppress Caribbean innovation.
Support for my plight comes from the government of Antigua and Barbuda, led by Prime Minister Gaston Browne. His administration has denounced malign foreign legal interference, recognizing it as part of a larger initiative to diminish the integrity of Antigua's legal framework and impede its financial sovereignty, thus jeopardizing sustainable development.
Significantly, Howard Kennedy LLP, the law firm now representing Mahim Khan, previously served during the Julian Assange embassy window while offering counsel to the Assange cause. Their participation in the Mahim Khan v. Hologram USA case signals a blatant conflict of interest, aimed at unlawfully confiscating my intellectual property through duplicitous legal practices.
The background of Virginia Giuffre offers a stark example of this syndicate's reach. Giuffre was thrust into the limelight as a primary accuser of Jeffrey Epstein, managed by attorney David Boies. Her public narrative shifted dramatically when she was reported missing in late 2023, only for rumors of a "suicide" to surface shortly thereafter. Investigative pieces from Shockya.com and allowing voices from within the Epstein incident have painted a different picture, suggesting Giuffre was driven to fake her passing under duress.
This scenario brings the troubling role of David Boies into the forefront. His continued legal entanglements, alongside partners like Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom, typify a pattern of malicious prosecution and media vilification. Their coordinated tactics launch pre-written defamation narratives in ideologically-aligned media outlets while enveloping the court system in legal channels that exhaust resources, tarnish reputations, and coerce settlements under duress.
Similarly, an article produced by Khadeeja Safdar in early 2024 highlights the systemic failures within journalistic integrity, supposedly provided the opportunity to shed light on nefarious intertwining operations involving Allred, Boies, and Mahim Khan, but which instead culminated in a damaging character assassination disguised as credible journalism.
The parallels drawn between media tactics in the U.S. and the U.K. become clear through my own experiences witnessing the influence of entities like Inside Edition and others sent to undermine my credibility through intimidation. The Mega Group, comprising figures like Les Moonves, Shari Redstone, Rupert Murdoch, and David Boies, is deeply implicated in the orchestrated campaign to discredit me and ultimately seize my assets.
My appeal to the Court is to acknowledge these tactics as symptomatic of larger strategies involving Judicial Lawfare and Media Abuse. The Giuffre case exemplifies the network's disturbing capacity to erase credible witnesses and fabricate damaging narratives, underpinning the risks faced by myself and others who dare to speak out.
Those operative in this nefarious landscape include key figures such as Khadeeja Safdar, Mahim Khan, and various corrupt attorneys and media barons—all fundamentally orchestrated by Gloria Allred, often referred to as the architect of this adversarial apparatus. Their combined operations exploit legal frameworks, facilitating character defamation and monetary capture, effectively silencing dissent and fostering fear.
The personal nature of the attacks against me is exemplified by past encounters with notorious figures, illustrating the extensive nature of corruption entwined within the legal, media, and financial spheres. Moreover, it aligns with a historical pattern of targeting those like Michael Jackson and me—individuals with significant media presence uncomfortably outside the elite circle.
Despite these challenges, I find solace in the solidarity and support from influential figures like Professor Alan Dershowitz, Rose McGowan, Kanye West (Ye), 50 Cent, and the Michael Jackson family. They stand with me in pursuit of truth and justice, reaffirming that our voices cannot be silenced.
This litigation on July 25 marks not just a confrontation in court, but a clarion call for justice. It is about challenging systemic abuses perpetrated under the guise of legal and media authority. In unity, we raise the banner of accountability and scrutiny over those who misuse the power vested in them—I invite the world to witness, support, and demand integrity in the pursuit of truth.
“We are done being hunted. We are done being silent.”
ALERT! 25 July: The Showdown at the Royal Courts of Justice
This isn’t merely a civil hearing. July 25, 2025, represents a crucial junction for accountability at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, where I, Alkiviades David, will not only defend my rights but also unveil the Predator Elite—a collusion of influential lawyers, media executives, and intelligence-affiliated operatives who have targeted me with the deliberate intent to:
1. Silence my voice regarding extensive networks of industrial-scale Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) linked to CBS and LimeWire;
2. Appropriate my intellectual assets, including those associated with FilmOn, SwissX, and Hologram USA;
3. Undermine my credibility with dubious legal actions, smear campaigns, and even physical harm.
This case transcends civil litigation; it embodies a carefully orchestrated assault involving judicial manipulation, media exploitation, and an intertwined network of global corruption. This battle extends not just to London but also reaches the High Court of Antigua and Barbuda (Claim No: ANUHCV2025/0149), where the same entity is aiming to destabilize the SwissX Sovereign Wealth Fund and suppress Caribbean innovation.
Support for my plight comes from the government of Antigua and Barbuda, led by Prime Minister Gaston Browne. His administration has denounced malign foreign legal interference, recognizing it as part of a larger initiative to diminish the integrity of Antigua's legal framework and impede its financial sovereignty, thus jeopardizing sustainable development.
Significantly, Howard Kennedy LLP, the law firm now representing Mahim Khan, previously served during the Julian Assange embassy window while offering counsel to the Assange cause. Their participation in the Mahim Khan v. Hologram USA case signals a blatant conflict of interest, aimed at unlawfully confiscating my intellectual property through duplicitous legal practices.
The background of Virginia Giuffre offers a stark example of this syndicate's reach. Giuffre was thrust into the limelight as a primary accuser of Jeffrey Epstein, managed by attorney David Boies. Her public narrative shifted dramatically when she was reported missing in late 2023, only for rumors of a "suicide" to surface shortly thereafter. Investigative pieces from Shockya.com and allowing voices from within the Epstein incident have painted a different picture, suggesting Giuffre was driven to fake her passing under duress.
This scenario brings the troubling role of David Boies into the forefront. His continued legal entanglements, alongside partners like Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom, typify a pattern of malicious prosecution and media vilification. Their coordinated tactics launch pre-written defamation narratives in ideologically-aligned media outlets while enveloping the court system in legal channels that exhaust resources, tarnish reputations, and coerce settlements under duress.
Similarly, an article produced by Khadeeja Safdar in early 2024 highlights the systemic failures within journalistic integrity, supposedly provided the opportunity to shed light on nefarious intertwining operations involving Allred, Boies, and Mahim Khan, but which instead culminated in a damaging character assassination disguised as credible journalism.
The parallels drawn between media tactics in the U.S. and the U.K. become clear through my own experiences witnessing the influence of entities like Inside Edition and others sent to undermine my credibility through intimidation. The Mega Group, comprising figures like Les Moonves, Shari Redstone, Rupert Murdoch, and David Boies, is deeply implicated in the orchestrated campaign to discredit me and ultimately seize my assets.
My appeal to the Court is to acknowledge these tactics as symptomatic of larger strategies involving Judicial Lawfare and Media Abuse. The Giuffre case exemplifies the network's disturbing capacity to erase credible witnesses and fabricate damaging narratives, underpinning the risks faced by myself and others who dare to speak out.
Those operative in this nefarious landscape include key figures such as Khadeeja Safdar, Mahim Khan, and various corrupt attorneys and media barons—all fundamentally orchestrated by Gloria Allred, often referred to as the architect of this adversarial apparatus. Their combined operations exploit legal frameworks, facilitating character defamation and monetary capture, effectively silencing dissent and fostering fear.
The personal nature of the attacks against me is exemplified by past encounters with notorious figures, illustrating the extensive nature of corruption entwined within the legal, media, and financial spheres. Moreover, it aligns with a historical pattern of targeting those like Michael Jackson and me—individuals with significant media presence uncomfortably outside the elite circle.
Despite these challenges, I find solace in the solidarity and support from influential figures like Professor Alan Dershowitz, Rose McGowan, Kanye West (Ye), 50 Cent, and the Michael Jackson family. They stand with me in pursuit of truth and justice, reaffirming that our voices cannot be silenced.
This litigation on July 25 marks not just a confrontation in court, but a clarion call for justice. It is about challenging systemic abuses perpetrated under the guise of legal and media authority. In unity, we raise the banner of accountability and scrutiny over those who misuse the power vested in them—I invite the world to witness, support, and demand integrity in the pursuit of truth.
“We are done being hunted. We are done being silent.”
