In brief
The European Court of Human Rights has ordered Turkey to immediately release Osman Kavala, a philanthropist who has spent nearly a decade in prison on politically motivated charges. The court criticised his life sentence as inhuman and highlighted systemic abuses of Turkey’s judiciary. Kavala’s case, linked to the 2013 Gezi Park protests and the 2016 coup attempt, illustrates use of courts to silence critics. Turkey has repeated failures to comply with earlier ECHR rulings, making this decision a critical moment in the conflict between Ankara and Strasbourg over rule‑of‑law standards.
European Court of Human Rights Orders Turkey to Release Imprisoned Businessman
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ordered Turkey to immediately release Osman Kavala, an activist and philanthropist who has been detained in prison for almost a decade.
Kavala was sentenced to life behind bars in 2022 for charges related to nationwide protests in 2013 and a failed coup attempt three years later.
Since his initial arrest and detention in 2017, rights groups and Kavala himself have maintained that the charges against him are politically motivated.
The ECHR ruled that his continued detention was unlawful and that his rights to a fair trial, freedom of expression and association had been violated.
"The measures taken against the applicant…had been predominantly motivated by an ulterior purpose, namely, to punish him for his role in the Gezi Park demonstrations and for expressing his opinions as a human rights defender, and to silence him," the court’s ruling states.
The court also found that Kavala’s aggravated life sentence amounted to “inhuman and degrading treatment”.
Rights advocates and opposition groups say President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government has increasingly weaponised the judiciary to target critics and rivals.
The court said Kavala’s case had exposed a "systemic problem" in Turkey of the "detention and prosecution of political opponents, human rights defenders and journalists", adding that there were "structural shortcomings" affecting the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.
The Turkish government has insisted the country’s courts are independent.
