In a notable shift in response strategies, military leaders have ordered the National Guard across all U.S. states to organize a quick reaction force designed to intervene in civil disturbances and riots. This move comes amidst the Trump administration's ongoing ambitions to strengthen the military's role in domestic issues such as immigration and crime control.

Recent memos distributed to National Guard units in every state, along with U.S. territories except Washington D.C., outline plans for training soldiers in specialized methods for managing civil unrest, including the appropriate use of non-lethal crowd control weapons such as batons, body shields, tasers, and pepper spray.

Signed by Major General Ronald Burkett of the National Guard, these directives aim to equip over 23,000 troops, with units specified to maintain a capacity for rapid deployment—reportedly able to mobilize a quarter of their personnel within eight hours and all by the next day.

This initiative aligns with an executive order issued by President Trump last August, directed at enhancing quick reaction capabilities across the military for potential nationwide use. To facilitate this task, individual states are tasked with achieving operational readiness by January 1, 2026, under the guidance of the National Guard Bureau, which will provide equipment and trainers.

During a recent discussion with homeland security officials, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth emphasized the legal avenues through which the National Guard can be employed, indicating multiple levels of response potential. Despite this preparation, attempts to deploy the Guard in certain urban areas have faced legal hurdles, with notable court rulings blocking troop mobilizations in regions like Chicago and challenges emerging in Portland.

As unrest continues across various cities, these newly organized quick reaction forces reflect a significant pivot in how military resources may be utilized domestically, raising questions about the implications of deploying military forces to civil contexts, often amidst local governmental objections.