Why Regulatory Approval Must Be Paused or Denied
The proposed merger between Warner Bros. Discovery and Netflix must be stopped because it would create irreversible concentration at a moment when judicial, regulatory, and administrative review is actively ongoing across multiple jurisdictions.
Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court — Antigua Case Review
The image above depicts the courtroom of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in Antigua & Barbuda, where a major civil matter has been judicially anchored under Case No. ANUHCV2025/0149. The consolidated filings and exhibits accepted into the record include extensive documentary material, declarations, and procedural evidence now subject to ongoing judicial review.
According to the publicly filed court record, a series of procedural events led to 84 defaults in responsive pleadings or appearances. Those defaults, together with other evidentiary submissions, have been aggregated in filings alleging significant liabilities. The pleadings describe a projected total of 73T (seventy-three trillion) in sovereign and ancillary liabilities — a figure presented for procedural and comparative context in ongoing judicial and regulatory consideration.
A procedural milestone scheduled for January 16 is expected to fix the current record and solidify evidence preservation obligations. From that date forward, the case status, default enforcement, and associated liabilities will be treated as part of a consolidated judicial posture across jurisdictions.
As with all matters referenced here, these figures and events are described in court filings and exhibits. No findings of liability, criminal determination, or adjudication of fact have yet been entered on these numeric projections; they are currently presented for judicial and investigative consideration.
