In brief
The Central Election Commission estimated the cost of Bulgaria’s two‑round presidential election at approximately €3 million. The figure covers public awareness campaigns, staff and volunteer compensation, and training, while 31 voting machines malfunctioned during the first round. The commission noted repairs, mobile polling stations for people with disabilities, and a 22.98 % turnout in the first round.
During an interview on Bulgarian National Television on October 30, 2026, the spokesperson for Central Election Commission (CEC), Stoyanka Balova, presented the financial estimate for the country’s recent two‑round presidential election: roughly €3 million. The amount, she explained, covers the public awareness campaign, compensation for staff and volunteers, and training for election workers in both rounds.
Balova also revealed that 31 voting machines failed during the first round held on October 25, of which two had been used abroad. She added that the problems had been resolved and the machines were now under repair. The incident prompted scrutiny from observers and a follow‑up on the reliability of the electronic voting infrastructure.
Addressing concerns raised by the Ombudsman regarding the accessibility of polling stations, the CEC spokesperson highlighted the use of mobile polling stations for people with disabilities. She noted that the responsibility for ensuring accessibility lies with local municipalities, and the commission has not received any reports of a voter being unable to reach a polling station and cast a vote.
Additionally, Balova reminded voters that the standard voting procedure requires them to wait for the audible signal before removing the card from the machine; otherwise, the vote may not be recorded. This reminder followed similar guidance issued prior to each round to reinforce the integrity of the ballot‑processing system.
Implications for Public Trust and Electoral Integrity
The cost estimate, while a routine administrative disclosure, carries broader civic stakes. By publicly communicating how the electoral budget is allocated, the CEC fosters transparency among voters, enabling citizens to assess whether resources were used in a manner that supports democratic participation.
The malfunction of 31 electronic machines underscores the importance of technical reliability for electoral inclusivity. Reports of unrepaired or unavailable voting devices can erode confidence in the overall electoral process, especially when the public is aware of the potential for procedural errors that might affect vote counts.
Mobile polling stations are an additional measure to promote accessibility for voters with mobility challenges. By complying with the Ombudsman’s recommendations, the CEC seeks to demonstrate a commitment to inclusive participation – a core tenet of democratic governance that addresses the needs of citizens who might otherwise face voting barriers.
The combination of low voter turnout – 22.98 % in the first round – and a high number of voting‑machine malfunctions highlights potential gaps in civic engagement and logistical preparedness. While the CEC’s statement affirms that no reports of voting untimeliness or inability to vote were received, the overall turnout indicates that a substantial segment of the electorate did not participate. This statistic remains a subject for electoral analysts and policy makers when considering reforms to increase voter engagement.
In sum, the CEC’s disclosure of a €3 million expenditure, coupled with the technical issues and accessibility measures mentioned, reflects the complexities of conducting a national election. The financial, procedural, and accessibility aspects converge to shape public confidence in the electoral system, demonstrate accountability of state institutions, and affect how easily citizens can exercise their democratic right to vote.
