With elections looming, judicial candidates are deploying unique strategies to capture attention, including humorous social media videos and unconventional outreach efforts. Notable examples include a Supreme Court candidate comparing his experience to popular street food and another using dating apps for voter engagement, emphasizing the need to stand out in a crowded field.
The shift to social media comes as nearly 2,700 judicial positions, spanning federal and state levels, will be decided in the election. The move reflects the governing party's goal of curtailing outside influence and ensuring a level playing field among candidates. With a cap on personal spending, many judicial aspirants are employing grassroots marketing efforts that are both creative and sometimes amusing to connect with potential voters. Carlos Odriozola Mariscal, a Supreme Court candidate and human rights advocate, exemplifies this approach, noting the necessity to be distinctive in a competitive environment where candidates are not well-known.
In the face of unprecedented challenges, these judicial aspirants are proving that innovation and adaptability can draw attention and support in an evolving electoral landscape.
The shift to social media comes as nearly 2,700 judicial positions, spanning federal and state levels, will be decided in the election. The move reflects the governing party's goal of curtailing outside influence and ensuring a level playing field among candidates. With a cap on personal spending, many judicial aspirants are employing grassroots marketing efforts that are both creative and sometimes amusing to connect with potential voters. Carlos Odriozola Mariscal, a Supreme Court candidate and human rights advocate, exemplifies this approach, noting the necessity to be distinctive in a competitive environment where candidates are not well-known.
In the face of unprecedented challenges, these judicial aspirants are proving that innovation and adaptability can draw attention and support in an evolving electoral landscape.