US President Donald Trump has announced the reversal of the so-called endangerment finding, a key Obama-era scientific ruling that underpins much of US environmental legislation. This change means looser greenhouse gas regulations, with experts predicting various environmental and economic impacts, though the decision is expected to face legal challenges from environmental groups.
Fewer Greenhouse Gas Emissions Restrictions
The outcome of this legislative change will likely result in fewer restrictions on greenhouse-gas-producing industries, notably vehicle manufacturers. The 2009 endangerment finding identified gases like carbon monoxide and methane as threats to future generations. With its removal, the legal foundation limiting US industries' greenhouse gas emissions is weakened, potentially leading to up to 18 billion additional tonnes of emissions by 2055, a cost that could reach into the trillions.
Cheaper Cars in the US (But Harder to Export)
While the administration argues that eliminating this finding will benefit the economy by lowering car manufacturing costs significantly, it raises questions about the global competitiveness of US automotive products amid stricter international climate targets.
Nuisance Lawsuits
The removal of the endangerment ruling may lead to a resurgence of public nuisance lawsuits, as states could once again pursue corporate polluters, creating legal challenges for industries.
Public Health
With the EPA claiming that emissions standards are not essential for protecting human health, scientists counter that pollutants contribute to health issues, which could escalate significantly without regulatory oversight, resulting in thousands of premature deaths and countless hospital visits by 2055.
Falling Behind in the Global Renewables Race
This deregulatory action raises concerns about the U.S. falling behind in the renewable energy sector, as global competitors continue to innovate and adapt to clean vehicle standards.
Less Industry Regulation
Despite arguments about economic growth, experts warn that this deregulation could lead to long-term consequences for both the environment and public health, suggesting that the benefits may be short-lived against the backdrop of potential climate change impacts.





















