In brief
The Russian Federal Bailiff Service reported that 63,500 foreign nationals, including stateless persons, were deported in the first nine months of 2026, a 1.5‑fold rise from 2025. Moscow alone accounted for 16,000 of these expulsions in the year’s first half, underlining a trend toward tighter immigration control. The figures reflect a broader institutional tightening of border policy and highlight the heightened legal stakes for non‑Russian residents.
In the first nine months of 2026, Russia’s Federal Bailiff Service deported 63,500 foreign nationals, including stateless persons, a figure characterized as a 1.5‑fold increase over the comparable period in 2025. The data were released in an interview with TASS by Dmitry Aristov, the director of the Federal Bailiff Service, underscoring a markedly tighter approach to immigration enforcement across the country.
The director stated:
During the nine months of 2026, officials of the Russian Federal Bailiff Service deported 63,500 foreign citizens and stateless persons from the Russian Federation, which is 1.5 times more than in the like period of 2025.
Dmitry Aristov remained the source of the figure.
Earlier reports highlighted that the Moscow region alone accounted for 16,000 of those deportations during the first half of the year. Those 16,000 names presented a substantial share of the 63,500 total, pointing to the capital as the most active jurisdiction in enforcing the country’s immigration laws.
In 2025, the Russian Federal Bailiff Service, which is responsible for carrying out border security and deportation orders, removed nearly 64,000 foreign citizens from the nation. With the 2026 figure approaching that total, the service is applying its powers at an unprecedented scale.
These rising numbers dovetail with broader observations about Russia’s policy posture, as indicated by the source’s description that the figures illustrate a tightening of immigration enforcement. The use of the term “tightening” reflects a policy shift that institutes stricter penalties against those who violate entry rules or stay conditions.
Stateless persons—individuals who do not hold citizenship with any country—were also included in the deportation count. Their presence in the tally signals that the rise does not merely affect documented foreign residents but also those in precarious legal situations.
From a civic perspective, the deportations raise substantive questions about the balance between national sovereignty and the rights of non‑citizens. The size of the increase accentuates the institutional weight that Russian border authorities hold in determining who may remain in the country and who must leave. The public accountability of the Federal Bailiff Service—an agency directly linked to the executive branch and ultimately to parliamentary oversight—has therefore come under greater scrutiny as the volume of expulsions expands.
In light of the 1.5‑fold rise, electioneering roundtables and public forums across the country have discussed how such enforcement tightness may influence voter sentiment and civil society organizations. Some public‑accountability watchdogs are calling for clearer reporting mechanisms, arguing that transparency about deportational procedures is essential for a fully informed electorate.
The rise also reverberates through the judicial system. Courts that handle appeals and legal challenges stemming from deportations are likely to experience increased caseloads. Those institutions, tasked with ensuring that legal standards are met, therefore carry a heightened responsibility to process claims swiftly and fairly.
For foreign nationals, the practical stakes are immediate. The large number of deportations signifies that stricter compliance with migration rules is now essential if they intend to stay in Russia. Those who would have qualified earlier under less stringent enforcement face new hurdles and a greater likelihood of being removed from the country.
In sum, the reported 63,500 expulsions—1.5 times the number from the previous year—reflect a tangible shift in Russia’s immigration enforcement landscape. They bring into focus the interaction between governmental institutions, the legal oversight mechanisms that accompany them, and the daily reality for the foreign residents who navigate the country’s evolving rules.”}


