ICC Suspends Prosecutor Karim Khan Amid Sexual Misconduct Probe

Tue Jun 09 2026 14:42:45 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

ICC’s chief prosecutor Karim Khan suspended as investigations into alleged misconduct continue, raising questions about accountability and the role of international justice.

The International Criminal Court’s top prosecutor, Karim Khan, has been suspended pending the outcome of a thorough inquiry into accusations of sexual misconduct and abuse of authority. A decision by the ICC’s management oversight body triggers a vote by its 125‑member states on Khan’s future, with the suspension not implying guilt. The allegations date back to reports made in 2024, and after a series of investigations—first by the Independent Oversight Mechanism and later by the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services—more than 5,000 pages of evidence were compiled. Meanwhile, Khan’s high‑profile political activities, including sanctions imposed by the United States for alleged interference in Israeli politics, have intensified scrutiny of the court. The outcome could influence the ICC’s credibility worldwide and lead to lengthy legal disputes if a removal attempt is challenged.

The ICC’s top prosecutor has been suspended

The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, has been suspended with immediate effect while an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse of authority continues.

Oversight body steps in, member states to vote

A group within the ICC’s management oversight body made the decision and has referred the matter to the court’s 125 member states, who will convene a special session "as soon as possible" to vote on Khan’s future. The suspension does not prejudice the outcome of the case, the oversight Bureau said.

Allegations and the investigation process

The allegations include unwanted sexual touching and abuse, as documented in a report that was cited in the media. The Independent Oversight Mechanism (IOM) opened an investigation after the allegations were reported in May 2024, but the case was closed when the alleged victim declined to cooperate. A second referral was made in October 2024, after which the matter was transferred to the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS). OIOS conducted a broader investigation from November 2024 to December 2025, producing more than 5,000 pages of evidence and testimony.

Judgement panel and possible outcomes

Following the OIOS findings, a panel of three judges reviewed the evidence to advise the Advisory Board on the ASP regarding whether Khan’s conduct amounted to serious misconduct, less serious misconduct, or no misconduct. A two‑thirds majority would be required to uphold any finding, followed by a separate vote on removal.

Skepticism and support

Khan has denied all allegations, describing the suspension as unlawful and procedurally unfair. Supporters argue the investigation failed to substantiate the claims, while staff members in the Office of the Prosecutor warn that his return could damage confidence in the institution and trigger retaliation concerns.

Political context and sanctions

The controversy coincides with broader political tensions. The United States imposed sanctions on Khan, after a high‑profile attempt to seek arrest warrants for Israeli leaders over alleged war crimes. Sanctions were later expanded to include other ICC staff and related organizations. Despite the ICC not being a member of the United States, Russia or Israel, the court can exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed by their nationals on ICC member territory.

Potential legal challenges

If the ASP sought Khan’s removal, he could challenge the decision before the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organization (ILOAT). A tribunal finding procedural flaws could lead to reinstatement and substantial compensation.

Implications for the ICC’s credibility

The suspension underscores the importance of transparent and fair internal oversight in an institution that is already under intense scrutiny. The global community will watch closely how the ICC resolves this turmoil and how it maintains public trust in the pursuit of international justice.