The Trump administration has requested that the United States Congress approve $87.6 billion in additional appropriations, with the bulk aimed at supporting the current military campaign in Iran. This request follows a resolution passed by Congress that urges the president to withdraw combat forces and condemn the war.

Of the requested amount, $67 billion is directed to the Department of Defence. Within this, the budget includes $21 billion for munitions, $17.3 billion for operational costs, and $12.1 billion for classified programmes. The remaining $20.6 billion addresses unrelated needs: $11 billion is earmarked for U.S. farmers, and $1.4 billion is allocated to tackle the Ebola outbreak in Central Africa.

Congress faces a difficult decision. The Iran conflict has grown increasingly unpopular among the electorate, and the upcoming midterm elections could shape the composition of the House and Senate. The White House Office of Management and Budget forwarded a formal letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson, detailing the request and explaining that most of the funds will address “urgent needs related to Operation Epic Fury (OEF).” The letter also highlighted that $300 million would strengthen security at U.S. embassies and diplomatic posts in the Middle East and South Asia after recent attacks.

In addition to the budget proposal, White House officials have met with Senator Republicans, expressing frustration over a war‑powers resolution that restricts executive military authority. The resolution was the first of its kind to instruct a president to end a military action, and it has sparked heated exchanges in the Capitol. GOP senators who voted alongside Democrats have called the resolution poorly timed and ineffective, while the president has referred to those lawmakers as “losers.”

The Pentagon’s chief financial officer reported that the war has cost about $29 billion to date. However, defence analysts and lawmakers argue that this data underestimates the entire damage. The ongoing conflict also raises concerns about the adequacy of defensive stocks and the overall sustainability of U.S. military resources abroad.