[ "NASA announced a detailed plan for a permanent lunar base that could transform the Moon from a science‑testing ground into a launchpad for human missions to Mars. The agency’s new programme, worth $20 billion, will see robotic landers, hopping drones and low‑gravity rovers hit the surface before any human leaves the launchpad.", "The first phase—running from 2029 to 2032—will launch 25 robotic missions to the south pole. Blue Origin’s Endurance will be tasked with precise landings, while Astrobotic’s Griffin‑1 and other contractors will deliver high‑resolution cameras and atmospheric probing tools. NASA said the missions will deposit roughly 4 metric tonnes of science payloads on the lunar surface while mapping the challenging terrain that traditional rovers can’t navigate.", "Following the robotic survey, NASA plans to develop and fly a nuclear‑powered infrastructure—small fission reactors and solar arrays—to supply a “semi‑permanent” habitat for astronauts. The idea is to set up housing, power, and life‑support systems that will keep crews alive while they explore the South Pole, where permanently shadowed craters may hold water ice that could be turned into drinking water or breathable oxygen.", "The programme’s ultimate goal is to populate the Moon by 2032. NASA will need a craft that can safely lower astronauts and cargo – a role assigned to SpaceX’s Starship Human Landing System. The system, however, has an uneven history of delays, and critics say the timeline is unrealistic given the technical hurdles, including autonomous navigation and safe lunar descent.", "NASA is racing against a parallel effort in China, which has announced plans to land humans on the Moon by 2030. The two governments are conducting parallel launches, with China’s Shenzhou‑23 crew already in orbit. Meanwhile, the U.S. President’s 2028 deadline pushes the US to deliver a return‑to‑Moon mission before the new administration settles in.", "While NASA’s enthusiasm is clear—We will never give up the Moon again, said administrator Jared Isaacman—the plan faces scrutiny from experts who worry that the cost and schedule do not match the high risk. Nevertheless, the US spends more on space than any other nation, and the public is leaning toward a return to the Moon as a stepping stone to deeper space exploration." ]